🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 825+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(825 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$1.63​
$2.72
Sale
βœ“ on the house shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2174021

Category: Toys > Sports Trading Cards > Hockey Trading Cards

Original Price:$2.72 USD

Sale Price: $1.63 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6267 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier purchase ever
Personally, the 1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394 works as described and it meets expectations. shipment was normal.
42 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
At first, it works as described and I don’t regret it. Works fine so far.
19 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
splendid value for money
Honestly, the 1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394 performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Arrived on time.
36 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 days ago Β· Denver, CO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous value for money
Not impressed, not disappointed. The 1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394 is okay.
3 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
Quality is not bad.
24 people found this helpful​