🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 406+ reviews
Men βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(406 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$179.99
$299.98
Sale
βœ“ on the house shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Neckline : V-neckPattern : ColourfulArticle number : LEP22Q02I-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper

Neckline : V-neck
Pattern : Colourful
Article number : LEP22Q02I-A11

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1413745

Category: Men > Clothing > Knitwear

Original Price:$299.98 USD

Sale Price: $179.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6004 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
The YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper is acceptable for the price.
46 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading purchase ever
To be fair, the YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper is user-friendly to use and it works for me.
39 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper
To be fair, the YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper feels okay so it’s acceptable.
6 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper is pleasant and efficient.
9 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips
2 weeks ago Β· Charlotte, NC​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
really pleased
After a few days, the YALE V NECK UNISEX - Jumper still works well.
10 people found this helpful