🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 937+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

We the at no charge paper bag shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(937 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18
$30
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

not once worn paper bag shorts from no-cost People. Size XS. Cream color.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution

↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

We the no-cost paper bag shorts

at no time worn paper bag shorts from complimentary People. Size XS. Cream color.

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1349552

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$30 USD

Sale Price: $18 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2013 reviews
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
solely what I wanted
Overall really happy with this We the no-cost paper bag shorts.
14 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
Personally, it works as described so no complaints.
15 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest
So far, it feels okay and it meets expectations.
43 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
To be fair, the We the on the house paper bag shorts works well enough so it’s acceptable.
27 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ultimate decision
After a few days, the We the complimentary paper bag shorts is practical so it’s acceptable.
19 people found this helpful